The Line of Beauty - Sex, anger, lust, danger: the semiotics of scarlet | 1843 | The Economist
The Line of BeautySex, anger, lust, danger: the semiotics of scarlet
A streak of red never goes out of fashion
by Matthew Sweet
Red is trouble. Sometimes too much trouble. Look at what it’s doing to these pages; this paragraph. Flooding them with the promiscuity of its associations: blood, desire, danger, anger, love, good luck, failure, frustration, fight, flight, fault. We might beg for it to stop, but we’d need red to make the sign. And what would be the point? When we speak of the power of its varieties – scarlet, crimson, claret, carmine – we’re evoking something that culture deploys but cannot quite control. Purple was stolen from sea snails and coded into imperial power. Horticulture domesticated greenness. Orange is the preposterous colour of lost causes and boiled sweets. But red is untameable. On the road, in the arena, in the bedroom, on the battlefield, at high and holy Mass, it arouses us. Engages our hot and despicable animal brains. Cuts to the chase.
What happens next?
Navigate an uncertain world with The Economist
- We filter out the noise of the daily news cycle and analyse the trends that matter
- We give you rigorous, deeply researched and fact-checked journalism. That’s why Americans named us their most trusted news source in 2017
- Available wherever you are—in digital, print and, uniquely, in audio, fully narrated by professional broadcasters
This website adheres to all nine of NewsGuard‘s standards of credibility and transparency.
OR